Topic summary
⁠16%2 analyzed articles/videos993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pet Adoption results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 1,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,979 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,205 of 16,562 topics). This Pet Adoption is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Pet Adoption
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,979
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos