Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Personalized Health results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 573 hits. Analysis detected 3,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,179 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,683 of 16,562 topics). This Personalized Health is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Personalized Health
Topic details
Total words: 2,179
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 16.8%16.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos