Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Period Tracking Apps results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,386 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,126 of 15,781 topics). This Period Tracking Apps is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Period Tracking Apps
Topic details
Total words: 1,386
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.5%19.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.0%17.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos