Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video1,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Perdida De Prestaciones Snap results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,531 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,102 of 16,562 topics). This Perdida De Prestaciones Snap is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Perdida De Prestaciones Snap
Topic details
Total words: 3,531
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos