Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon Policy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Hasty Generalization , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 2,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,210 of 16,562 topics). This Pentagon Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Pentagon Policy
Topic details
Total words: 1,584
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.6% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst