Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon Costs results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,748 of 16,562 topics). This Pentagon Costs is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Pentagon Costs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos