Author summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,027 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Norman results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,302 hits. Analysis detected 9,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,534 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,417 of 6,294 authors). This Greg Norman is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Greg Norman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠78%Greg Norman (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,534
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.2%22.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.5%23.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 6.5%6.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate