Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peacebuilding results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 3,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,652 of 15,988 topics). This Peacebuilding is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Peacebuilding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,332
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos