Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pattern Or Practice Investigations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.1% saturation with 1,614 hits. Analysis detected 8,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,042 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,172 of 15,689 topics). This Pattern Or Practice Investigations is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Pattern Or Practice Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 3,042
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.5% percentile
10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 53.1%53.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 20.4%20.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 14.1%14.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 25.5%25.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.9%26.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 53.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.5%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Red Herring: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos