Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Muldoon Dead Denise Richards Bathroom results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,015 hits. Analysis detected 4,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,052 of 16,562 topics). This Patrick Muldoon Dead Denise Richards Bathroom is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Patrick Muldoon Dead Denise Richards Bathroom
Topic details
Total words: 4,492
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.6%22.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos