Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parking Enforcement results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,283 of 16,562 topics). This Parking Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Parking Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos