Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fedor Zarkhin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 368 hits . Analysis detected 2,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,183 of 6,244 authors). This Fedor Zarkhin is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Fedor Zarkhin
Author details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst