Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park Incident results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 507 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,529 of 16,562 topics). This Park Incident is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Park Incident
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 507
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles507 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.4%2.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos