Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parenting Styles results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,406 of 16,562 topics). This Parenting Styles is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Parenting Styles
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠50%Parenting Styles (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Horn Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos