Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parasitic Infection results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 254 faulty-reasoning hits from 657 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,757 of 16,562 topics). This Parasitic Infection is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Parasitic Infection
Topic details
Total words: 657
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles657 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos