Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paraguay results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,379 hits. Analysis detected 7,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,359 of 15,988 topics). This Paraguay is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Paraguay
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,018
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.9%22.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.2%18.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos