Topic summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paper Industry results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Authority , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 1,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,304 of 16,562 topics). This Paper Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Paper Industry
Topic details
Total words: 2,115
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst