Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paparazzi results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,068 of 15,598 topics). This Paparazzi is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Paparazzi
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos