Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pan Dulce results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 57.9% saturation with 2,469 hits. Analysis detected 13,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,263 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,820 of 16,562 topics). This Pan Dulce is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Pan Dulce
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠89%Pan Dulce (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,263
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 57.9%57.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 48.1%48.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.9%38.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.2%30.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.6%13.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Topic 57.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 48.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 38.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos