Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pambondi results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 480 hits. Analysis detected 3,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,619 of 16,562 topics). This Pambondi is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Pambondi
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 23.2%23.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.5%30.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 23.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos