Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Bondi Memo results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 4,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,870 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,444 of 16,562 topics). This Pam Bondi Memo is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Pam Bondi Memo
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,870
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.3% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 29.9%29.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 30.2%30.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.9%31.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.1%31.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.8%31.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.4%12.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos