Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paleogenomics results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,641 of 16,562 topics). This Paleogenomics is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Paleogenomics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos