Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palau results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 88.5% saturation with 802 hits . Analysis detected 2,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 906 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,036 of 16,562 topics). This Palau is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Palau
Topic details
Total words: 906
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.8% percentile 11.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles906 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 88.5% 88.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 25.8% 25.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Topic 88.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst