Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palantir Technologies results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,792 hits. Analysis detected 14,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,486 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,189 of 15,447 topics). This Palantir Technologies is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Palantir Technologies
Topic details
Total words: 14,486
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos