Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Package Theft results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 522 hits. Analysis detected 3,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,893 of 16,562 topics). This Package Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Package Theft
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,811
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos