Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Package Theft results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 522 hits . Analysis detected 3,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,893 of 16,562 topics). This Package Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Package Theft
Topic details
Total words: 2,811
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst