Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacific Security results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,970 of 16,562 topics). This Pacific Security is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Pacific Security
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠70%Pacific Security (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Pacific's True Rogue State⁠35%
Quillette⁠64%By Aaron Sarin⁠50%7/14/2026, 5:54:35 PM