Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacific Division results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 3,441 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,257 of 16,562 topics). This Pacific Division is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Pacific Division
Topic details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 35.3% 35.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 35.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst