Topic summary
57%1 analyzed article/video2,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orwell results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 5,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (10,069 of 16,562 topics). This Orwell is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Orwell
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,138
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos