Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Originalism results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,630 hits. Analysis detected 9,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,548 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,189 of 16,562 topics). This Originalism is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Originalism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,548
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.4%29.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 18.3%18.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.2%19.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos