Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Oregon Politics results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 581 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Oregon Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Oregon Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,083
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos