Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Julian Balsley results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 99 hits . Analysis detected 581 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Julian Balsley is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Julian Balsley
Author details
Total words: 1,083
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Middle Ground: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst