Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oral Medication results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 2,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,801 of 16,562 topics). This Oral Medication is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Oral Medication
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 41.1%41.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 12.8%12.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 41.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos