Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonel Aleccia results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 904 hits . Analysis detected 3,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (894 of 6,606 authors). This Jonel Aleccia is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Jonel Aleccia
Author details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.5% percentile 5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.4% 34.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 34.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst