Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oral Hygiene results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 3,189 hits. Analysis detected 11,913 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,258 of 16,562 topics). This Oral Hygiene is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Oral Hygiene
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos