Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Space results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 4,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,055 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,354 of 16,562 topics). This Open Space is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Open Space
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,055
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.3%27.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.7%18.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos