Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Opec results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 666 hits. Analysis detected 6,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,572 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,904 of 15,685 topics). This Opec is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Opec
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,572
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos