Topic summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Services results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 1,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,271 of 16,562 topics). This Online Services is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Online Services
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.8%30.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 14.1%14.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.5%19.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.7%3.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos