Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Sales Regulations results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,159 of 22,963 topics). This Online Sales Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Online Sales Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 3,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos