Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Online Learning results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 804 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Online Learning is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Online Learning
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos