Topic summary
⁠23%3 analyzed articles/videos1,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Harassment results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 6,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,248 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,525 of 16,104 topics). This Online Harassment is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Online Harassment
Topic details
Total words: 7,248
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.4%11.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos