Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Grocery Delivery results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 70.8% saturation with 790 hits. Analysis detected 3,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 95% (875 of 16,562 topics). This Online Grocery Delivery is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Online Grocery Delivery
Topic details
Total words: 1,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.7% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 70.8%70.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 53.5%53.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 28.5%28.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 16.5%16.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.2%20.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 70.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 53.5%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos