Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Communities results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 3,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,632 of 16,562 topics). This Online Communities is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Online Communities
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠36%Online Communities (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,880
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos