Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These On Ice Confrontation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 363 hits. Analysis detected 2,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,469 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,721 of 16,562 topics). This On Ice Confrontation is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
On Ice Confrontation
Topic details
Total words: 1,469
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.6% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.5%23.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos