Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Olivia Wilde results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 2,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Olivia Wilde is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Olivia Wilde
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,624
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos