Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oklahoma City Thunder results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 237 hits. Analysis detected 1,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,136 of 16,562 topics). This Oklahoma City Thunder is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Oklahoma City Thunder
Topic details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos