Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos1,722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Tankers results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 816 hits. Analysis detected 4,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,166 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,464 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Tankers is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Oil Tankers
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos