Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Oil Tanker results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 579 faulty-reasoning hits from 436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Tanker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Oil Tanker
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Oil Tanker (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 436
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles436 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 35.3%35.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 35.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos