Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Price Drop results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 2,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,017 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Price Drop is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Oil Price Drop
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos