Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil (petroleum) And Gasoline results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Overconfidence Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,114 hits . Analysis detected 8,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,235 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,485 of 16,562 topics). This Oil (petroleum) And Gasoline is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Oil (petroleum) And Gasoline
Topic details
Total words: 14,235
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst