Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Oil Market Volatility results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 808 hits. Analysis detected 5,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,566 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Oil Market Volatility is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Oil Market Volatility
Topic details
Total words: 4,566
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos